185 | 0 | 33 |
下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
为探索不安全行为的致因条件,加强煤矿井下作业人员的不安全行为管控,以2021—2023年发生的87起煤矿井下机电事故和运输事故调查报告为研究对象,采用人因分析与分类系统(HFACS)和清晰集定性比较分析(csQCA)相结合的方法,开展煤矿井下作业人员的不安全行为致因组态分析。结果表明:不安全行为具有十分复杂的影响机制。其中,缺乏安全培训和缺乏安全素养是违规的充分条件,安全检查不足是差错的充分条件,任何因素不构成必要条件;加强组织安全培训和作业现场安全监督有助于减少作业人员违规行为的发生,而加强作业现场安全检查减少安全隐患可减少作业人员差错的发生。煤矿企业可结合自身不安全行为管控实际情况,依照本研究结果开展比对,分阶段、有计划地制定针对性措施。
Abstract:In order to explore the causal conditions of unsafe behaviors and strengthen the control of unsafe behaviors of underground coal miners, 87 investigation reports of electromechanical accidents and transportation accidents in underground coal mines in 2021-2023 are used as the research object. human factors analysis and classification system(HFACS) and crisp-sets qualitative comparative analysis(csQCA) are used to perform the configuration analysis of unsafe behaviors of underground coal mine workers..The results reveal the complex influence mechanisms behind unsafe behavior. The lack of safety training and safety literacy are sufficient conditions for violation, and inadequate safety inspection is a sufficient condition for error, and there is no necessary condition for two types of unsafe behaviors. Enhancing safety training and safety supervision can help to lower the frequency of violations, while enhancing safety checks to lower safety hazards can lower the frequency of errors. By integrating the actual circumstance of their own unsafe behavior control, coal mining enterprises can conduct a comparison in accordance with the findings of this research and develop targeted measures in phases and in a planned manner.
[1]佟瑞鹏.行为安全研究进展追溯与述评[J].安全,2019,40(7):1-14.
[2]CHEN Hong,QI Hui,FENG Qun.Characteristics of direct causes and human factors in major gas explosion accidents in chinese coal mines:case study spanning the years 1980-2010[J].Journal of loss prevention in the process industries,2013,26(1):38-44.
[3]陈思粮,江泽标,吴少康,等.瓦斯压力对低透性煤吸附—解吸特性及孔隙分布的影响[J].煤炭技术,2024,43(3):169-172.
[4]李红霞,郑昕尧,田水承,等.基于安全态度中介效应的矿工安全认知影响机制研究[J].煤矿安全,2024,55(7):245-250.
[5]陈子涵,李磊,欧阳有鹏,等.非正式组织视角下煤矿工人群体动力对不安全行为驱动因素分析[J].中国安全生产科学技术,2024,20(3):126-133.
[6]AN Yu,WANG Hui,YANG Xiaoyi,et al.Using the TPB and 24Model to understand workers' unintentional and intentional unsafe behaviour:A case study[J].Safety science,2023,163.DOI:10.1016/j.ssci.2023.106099.
[7]KUMAR D,BHATTACHARJEE R M.Reducing workplace unsafe behaviour using risk classification,profiling,risk tolerance approach[J].Heliyon,2023.DOI:10.4178/epih.e2018019.
[8]ALIABADI M M,AGHAEI H,KALATPOUR O,et al.Effects of human and organizational deficiencies on workers' safety behavior at a mining site in Iran[J].Epidemiology and health,2018.DOI:10.4178/epih.e2018019.
[9]MOHAMMADFAM I,BASCOMPTA M,KHAJEVANDI A A,et al.Modeling of causes and consequences of human error in mining processes design:A qualitative study[J].Sustainability,2022.DOI:10.3390/su142114193.
[10]WIEGMAN D,SHAPPELL S.Human error analysis of commercial aviation accidents using the human factors analysis and classification system (HFACS)[R].Champaign:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign,2001.
[11]许素睿,韩梦.基于HFACS的建筑施工起重伤害事故致因分析[J].安全,2023,44(7):37-42.
[12]王彪,孟子尧,张晓磊,等.化工行业临时用电安全HFACS模型及安全管理框架构建[J].安全,2023,44(6):100-104.
[13]肖之培.基于HFACS-GM模型的煤矿灾害事故人因分析与防控策略研究[D].淮南:安徽理工大学,2024.
[14]程建青,罗瑾琏,杜运周,等.制度环境与心理认知何时激活创业?一个基于QCA方法的研究[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2019,40(2):114-131.
[15]杜运周,贾良定.组态视角与定性比较分析(QCA):管理学研究的一条新道路[J].管理世界,2017(6):155-167.
[16]王立文,杨楠,张青松.航空人为因素与干预措施的关联性[J].综合运输,2022,44(4):67-72.
[17]FISS P C.Building better causal theories:A fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research[J].Academy of management journal,2011,54(2):393-420.
[18]张明,杜运周.组织与管理研究中QCA方法的应用:定位、策略和方向[J].管理学报,2019,16(9):1312-1323.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19737/j.cnki.issn1002-3631.2025.02.009
中图分类号:TD791
引用信息:
[1]孙宁昊,董国宇,李昕阳等.基于HFACS的煤矿井下作业人员不安全行为致因组态研究——以机电事故和运输事故为例[J].安全,2025,46(02):57-63.DOI:10.19737/j.cnki.issn1002-3631.2025.02.009.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金项目(52074302)